28 Comments
User's avatar
Crixcyon's avatar

Any speech is always an opinion...it may be completely true, partially true or not the truth at all. Government should never be determining what is truth or not since it knows nothing but lying.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

government has often enabled me to know what is true. When I wasn't sure about something, I'd see what gov't had to say about it. Knowing that if the gov't said "a" that the truth was "not a" has often been useful.

Expand full comment
djean111's avatar

Israel has just asked that the US federal government crack down on what they consider "hate speech" on American social platforms, deplatforming whoever is deemed to have written hate speech, and big fines for the platforms if they do not comply. Israel says the free speech amendment does not apply to social media platforms. So now we have an even bigger problem right here in the US. IMO.

Expand full comment
Annie Ocean's avatar

From Bard's FM with Dr Lee Merritt 6/2024: NUTSHELL:

JOHN HOPKINS STUDY OF DNA OF ISRAELIS AND PALESTINIANS:

97% OF ISRAELIS HAVE NO CONNECTION TO HEBREWS AND ARE ACTUALLY FROM PHRYGIA TURKEY

87% OF PALESTINIANS HAVE ANCIENT HEBREW ROOTS

This is quite the inversion that most folks do not know.

Expand full comment
Paula Wellington Heyes's avatar

Israel does not have that right any more than the UK does.

Expand full comment
djean111's avatar

I think Israel purchased that right quite a while ago. Just think - the supposed savior of American health, JFK Jr, announced that antisemitism is the biggest threat to Americans' health today.

Expand full comment
Geo Law's avatar

You have a point. The entire administration are ZIONISTS! Following the money.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

so it would seem that it's the fault of all of you people who prefer paying taxes to hiding your income. Without you, AIPAC would starve to death. And it has been your cooperation which will enable them to completely eliminate cash. Your children will starve to death because they'll believe idiocies brainwashed into them because you all paid taxes.

Expand full comment
Jon Olsen's avatar

What a cheerful outlook, MacDuff! But note: Those who despair never win battles!

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

I hate the Israeli government. They need to be eliminated from relevance immediately. Any statistics we have on what percentage of Israeli residents are in favor of their "government" are obviously unreliable. I hear the idiots they cite. I can't imagine, though I could be mistaken, that many people are as disgusting as the idiots I've seen who think that their lives are somehow more valuable than the lives of the palestinian women and children that the disgusting isra-hell-i government is killing. They are the only ones permitted to speak. They might be less than 5% of the population. The United States of America have been destroyed long ago. The people claiming to be their government are pedophiles who need to be killed in the name of justice. Donald Trump is about the biggest idiot I've ever seen, going bankrupt six times with nearly exclusive licenses to run a casino in an area where there are 7 digit numbers of people who could only gamble otherwise by traveling ten times further. People who don't see what's going on should provide me with the name of the grease they use to slide their heads in and out of their rectums so easily.

Expand full comment
Linda Campbell's avatar

WOW is he (ie. Marco Rubio) speaking with forked tongue??

The US is insisting on American citizens in other

countries/nations to NOT be censored/punished

for exercising their FREE SPEECH in that country ...

But, isn't Trump "removing" foreigners from this

nation for expressing their concerns and saying

things so incriminating like "FREE PALESTINE" ...

Is something amiss here ... what am I "missing"??

Expand full comment
unmaskingchildprotection's avatar

This is the concern I have. I am in total support of absolute free speech but I fear is the Trump agenda actually just about allowing speech for views they approve of but no speech for views they disapprove of? In which case it's not really free speech at all, is it?

That said the Online Safety Act is a truly evil law, if somehow they end up pressuring the UK to repeal it then that will be some sort of temporary victory for British citizens. Though as they say the price of freedom is eternal vigilance...

Expand full comment
Jon Olsen's avatar

Bingo!

Expand full comment
DawnieR's avatar

Now, if the United States CORPORATION would PRACTICE WTF THEY PREACH!!

Those of us here in the USSA are STILL BEING CENSORED! (via the ILLEGIT 'govt'!)

Expand full comment
M. N. Mead's avatar

The "we're coming for you" line sounds like hot air but I can see how overseas courts could try to apply their standards of speech control to US citizens. The new administration's position deserves mega praise, and your graphic carries some powerful irony -- the Nazis used the eagle as a symbol of power and authority for the Third Reich, emphasizing their ideology of dominance and racial supremacy.

Expand full comment
Nisanga's avatar

Gee, is this UK Police Commissioner Mark Rowley…?

I have a message for him:

“If you think in your

delusional thinking You’re

going prosecute Americans

for their Free-Speech,

You may go FUCK Yourself,

even publicly; for we

Americans don’t listen

to Idiots with Their Head up

their Ass..!!!!!

Fuck Off, Rowley

🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻

How’s that for some Free Speech??😂🤣😂huh.??

Prosecute THAT, AssHole.!

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

I would really want to know what sort of crease grease he uses to pull his head in and out of his arse so quickly. He's obviously quite limber.

Expand full comment
Geo Law's avatar

Freedom of Speech is HATE SPEECH, OFFENSIVE SPEECH, INSULTING SPEECH, FOUL LANGUAGE, Derogatory gestures... Doesn't matter if it's true or lies or somewhere in between...

Voicing one's opinion is NEVER going to compromised EVER again! After the bullshit censorship during COVID and not being able to speak the truth about one's medical preference or beliefs is NOT going to happen EVER again or shits gonna hit the fan big time!

There can be NO more compromise or exceptions when it comes to violating our rights! Our rights are being violated everyday and this MUST stop. It starts with knowing your rights, because the Constitution TRUMPS all Policies, codes regulations, mandates, etc...

For instance an officer has no authority to ask you to provide ID unless you've committed a crime or suspicion of a crime. Yet they they violate people's rights all the time and they think they the authority because many of them don't know the constitution even though they have sworn to uphold it.

Expand full comment
Jon Olsen's avatar

Great start! Now it needs to be applied within the US as well!

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

I guess that means that a certain tribe of people who seem to be completely brainwashed by their leaders and who dominated the u.s. and world slave trade back in the 1860s and have been kicked out of 109 countries more than 1030 times since records have been kept can now be mentioned by name?

Expand full comment
Nuala Norris's avatar

No Australian citizen should have their voice erased…

Expand full comment
Birgitta Lauren's avatar

Fantastic. I also read Spain instituted a law in November 2024 to protect all whistleblowers residing in Spain. No matter origin.

Expand full comment
Sheila Dean's avatar

It's really great and I hope stuff like this keeps happening!!

Expand full comment
ultradarkmaga's avatar

WHEN a member of the executive branch vilates and order from the President what are the penalties attached?

Expand full comment
Daniel Meegan's avatar

Praise The Lord 🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment
Annie Ocean's avatar

Is this about American citizens within the U.S.A. or American citizens speaking abroad?

Expand full comment
djean111's avatar

Just want to clarify that Israel is correct when saying that free speech does not apply to folks on social platforms. It does apply to the owners of social platforms. People only have actual freedom of speech when they own the website. So people who squawk about being censored on anybody else's website - Facebook, X, Youtube, or someone's sister's website dedicated to cooking eggplants or taking care of bunnies, do not really understand how free speech applies.. All up to the owner, and an owner will, IMO, take into consideration personal beliefs and how other posters on their website will react, as in will they quit, which may lessen revenue from advertising or membership fees. The free and fair debate demand is not valid, also the concept is getting diluted by the proliferation of bots.

This is my understanding, please correct me if wrong!

Expand full comment